The podcast episode delves into Wix, a company described as controversial and a "hit or miss case" by the hosts, especially after its stock plummeted 30% following recent earnings. Despite the sharp decline, the hosts believe the investment thesis isn't broken, viewing it as a potential multi-bagger from current prices if it remains relevant in five years, though they wouldn't be surprised if it were gone entirely.
Wix, initially a simple drag-and-drop website builder (2006-2014), aimed to reduce friction for non-coders, like local yoga teachers or small startup founders. Over time, it expanded significantly, adding crucial back-end tools such as payments (Wix Payments), bookings, CRM, email marketing, and e-commerce functionalities (post-2014). This bundling of services created significant staying power, especially for existing customers, reflected in its impressive 105% net retention rate. Newer customer cohorts generate significantly more revenue than older ones, largely due to these additional ecosystem offerings.
The third stage of Wix's development, from 2019 to today, saw it target more professional users through Wix Studio and make early investments in AI. This culminated in Wix Harmony, their AI website builder, and the acquisition of Base44. The market has heavily penalized Wix, with its stock down 70% in the past year, largely due to fears of AI disruption from tools like Cloud Code and Codex.
Base44, an AI-native tool builder, is highlighted as Wix's main counter to these threats. Unlike general LLMs, Base44 acts as a specialized wrapper, providing essential infrastructure like hosting, databases, and authentication, simplifying the complex backend for non-developers. While Base44 leverages third-party LLMs like Gemini and Cloud, Wix has also announced developing its own LLM for Harmony. The economic argument is that large LLM providers might prefer to be "tollbooths" in the background rather than directly competing in niche applications like web building.
Financially, Wix reports two main segments: Creative Subscriptions (legacy SaaS, 1.4 billion revenue, 11-12% growth) and Business Solutions (back-end tools, 600 million revenue, 20% growth, largely driven by Wix Payments). The company's strategy involved aggressively raising prices on lower-tier plans, leading to a planned churn in premium subscribers but focusing on higher-value, more deeply embedded customers. Revenue and bookings are re-accelerating, and free cash flow margins have surged from 2% in 2022 to 30% today, a 19x increase in dollar terms, demonstrating strong operating leverage. Wix even achieves a Rule of 40 score of 43%. While stock-based compensation (SBC) is a drag, adjusted free cash flow still stands at an 18% margin.
The acquisition of Base44 in mid-2025 for $80 million upfront, plus earn-outs, has seen it grow from $3 million to $150 million in ARR within a year, demonstrating phenomenal growth driven by Wix's substantial marketing budget (including a Super Bowl ad) and cross-promotion opportunities within its 300 million registered user base. Base44's unit economics are already positive for paying users, and LLM inference costs are decreasing, with management expecting its FCF margin to eventually converge with Wix's core business (around 30%).
In terms of capital allocation, Wix authorized a significant $2 billion share repurchase program in late 2025, representing about 50% of its market cap at the time. Executed via a Dutch auction, it retired approximately 30% of the float. Though the stock has dropped since, the buyback at $92 signaled management's view of deep undervaluation. A private placement of $250 million with Durable Capital (Henry Ellenbogen's fund) at a discount, while seemingly odd alongside buybacks, was seen as a strategic move to secure a long-term institutional shareholder and ward off activist pressure. The company also carries $1.5 billion in zero-coupon convertible notes with conversion strikes well above current prices, making them essentially free financing without immediate dilution risk.
Despite these positives, key risks include the low insider ownership (CEO owns 1.5%) and lack of recent insider buying, which the hosts view as a "yellow flag" given the stock's undervaluation. They also emphasize the intensely competitive nature of the website builder space, with low switching costs for new customers and no clear sustainable competitive advantage.
The hosts present a calculated gamble: a base case sees Wix's core business slowing while Base44 drives overall 11% revenue growth, leading to a 20% annual return. A bear case, however, envisions massive disruption from AI, leading to a collapse in free cash flow with no floor, given the lack of tangible assets. The bull case, though less likely (20% probability), projects Base44 growing 50% annually and a narrative shift where Wix becomes an AI winner, potentially making it a multi-bagger.
Ultimately, while the valuation appears very attractive (trading at low FCF multiples, large cash balance, Base44 "for free"), the high uncertainty and lack of a durable moat make Wix unsuitable for their intrinsic value portfolio. They conclude it's a "nice gamble" for small amounts of money, prioritizing downside risk over optimizing for upside in their investment philosophy.