On a recent episode of the Millennial Investing Podcast, host Sean O'Malley delved into the research of Aswath Damodaran, NYU's "Dean of Valuation," and Michael Mobison and Dan Callahan of Morgan Stanley, to explore the intricacies of the corporate life cycle and its profound implications for investors.
Damodaran, renowned for making his extensive finance material freely available, emphasizes that understanding a company's life stage is critical for valuation and investment strategy. He draws a parallel between corporate aging and human aging, noting that companies, much like people, often struggle to accept decline, leading to detrimental "Hail Mary" attempts to reignite growth, often destroying shareholder wealth. Capitalism, built on creative destruction, necessitates that companies eventually fade, making graceful decline a healthier, albeit difficult, management response.
Damodaran outlines six phases of the corporate life cycle: Startups, Young Growth, High Growth, Mature Growth, Mature Stable, and Decline. Each phase requires different management priorities and valuation approaches. Startups and young companies, with high uncertainty and often negative profitability, are typically valued using "pricing" – comparing them to similar firms based on multiples like revenue. Mature companies, with more predictable cash flows, are better suited for "intrinsic valuation," which discounts future cash flows. O'Malley highlights that a "well-done valuation is a bridge between stories and numbers," with the balance shifting across the life cycle.
A key takeaway is that no "universally great CEO" exists; the ideal leadership changes with the company's stage. A visionary founder might be perfect for a startup but ill-suited for managing the operational complexities of a mature company or the delicate process of decline. Accepting decline gracefully, by divesting non-performing assets and returning capital to shareholders, is often the most pragmatic approach, yet difficult for management motivated by ego and incentives.
O'Malley illustrates these concepts with case studies:
1. **Walgreens:** Deep in decline, facing intense competition and shrinking margins. Its market cap has plummeted. Damodaran suggests it's a prime candidate for gracefully accepting decline, as reversal odds are low.
2. **Intel:** Once a tech superstar, now contracting with falling margins. Despite a sharper decline than Walgreens, its industry is still vibrant, offering hope for rejuvenation if it can accept a more subordinate role. Damodaran, seeing it as undervalued, has invested in Intel.
3. **Starbucks:** Not as clearly in decline as the other two, showing solid revenue growth and improving margins. However, Damodaran argues it lacks a compelling "story" for future growth, particularly in international expansion, placing it at a critical inflection point.
The podcast then transitions to Michael Mobison and Dan Callahan's research, which measures a company's "age" by analyzing the spread between its returns on capital (ROC) and its weighted average cost of capital (WACC). A positive spread indicates competitive advantage. Their study of IPO'd companies from 1990-2022 found that companies often exhibit their highest spreads at IPO, which then decline and stabilize. This suggests that many public companies are already well into their life cycle.
Crucially, the corporate life cycle is not linear. Companies like Amazon and Netflix demonstrate dynamic transitions between growth and maturity, and even temporary declines. Mobison and Callahan found that the most effective investment strategy lies in identifying companies at "transition points" – particularly those moving *into* growth or maturity. Companies transitioning from decline to growth or maturity generated significantly higher average annual returns.
O'Malley concludes by emphasizing the importance of diversification across the corporate life cycle. While early-stage companies carry higher mortality risks, they offer significant upside. Mature companies provide more stable, albeit modest, returns. Investors should assess a company's life stage, management's approach to it, and their own perception versus market expectations to identify value. Ultimately, "companies which are after all legal entities that operate businesses should fade away as the reasons for their existence fade," making a healthy understanding and acceptance of corporate decline vital for a functioning capitalist economy.