The new Z Fold 8 from Samsung is wider, shorter, but feels right in the hand.

以下是内容的中文翻译： The Verge 的 David Amell 介绍了三星 Galaxy Z Fold 8，并强调其显著改变且独特的屏幕宽高比是其最引人注目的特点。Z Fold 8 摆脱了以往的折叠屏设计，旨在通过其全新的尺寸重新定义用户体验。 Z Fold 8 的外屏采用了 10:16 的屏幕宽高比。这使得手机看起来明显更短更宽，与传统智能手机相比，呈现出一种更“方正”的外形。Amell 形容其手感让人联想到个人数字助理（PDA）或某种专业的“小工具式设备”，这表明它摆脱了典型手机的细长外形。这种设计选择意味着它专注于一种不同的手持交互方式，可能更倾向于单手操作，或在折叠状态下为快速任务提供更宽阔的显示区域。 展开后，设备展现出一个 4:3 宽高比的内屏，旋转后也可以看作是 3:4。Amell 强调了这一内屏的多功能性。4:3 的横向显示被认为是观看视频内容的绝佳选择，比传统的窄屏提供更广阔的观看区域。反之，当以 3:4 的纵向方式握持时，它就变成了一个理想的电子阅读格式，模仿了书籍或专用电子阅读器的尺寸。这种特殊的宽高比正日益受到欢迎，Amell 提到有报道称苹果也在开发一款具有类似比例的设备，这使得三星凭借 Z Fold 8 “抢先一步”。 Amell 承认 4:3 的比例并非标准的 16:9 或 2:1，这意味着用户在观看某些媒体内容时仍会遇到黑边，但他认为这比许多传统折叠屏手机中近乎正方形的内屏有了显著改进。因此，新的宽高比在折叠屏的范畴内取得了平衡，提供了更好的媒体和阅读体验。 Amell 接着将 Z Fold 8 与其高端版本 Z Fold 8 Ultra 进行了直接比较，尤其是在摄像头方面。标准版 Z Fold 8 配备了双摄像头系统，包括一个 5000 万像素的主传感器和一个 5000 万像素的超广角传感器。相比之下，Z Fold 8 Ultra 则拥有更全面的三摄像头系统，其中包括一个巨大的 2 亿像素主摄像头、一个 5000 万像素的超广角镜头和一个 1000 万像素的长焦镜头。这一显著差异意味着 Z Fold 8 将无法提供与 Ultra 型号相同的先进摄影功能。 然而，在电池续航和充电方面，两款型号则更为接近。Z Fold 8 配备了 4800 毫安时的电池，仅比 Z Fold 8 Ultra 的 5000 毫安时电池略小。两款设备都支持快速充电，提供 45 瓦有线充电和 20 瓦无线充电功能。这种电源功能上的对等性确保了即使是标准版 Z Fold 8 也能提供强大的续航能力和快速充电。 自然，规格上的差异也体现在价格上。三星 Galaxy Z Fold 8 的售价为 1900 美元，比售价 2100 美元的 Z Fold 8 Ultra 便宜 200 美元。Ultra 型号的 200 美元溢价为用户带来了更先进的摄像头阵列、更高的分辨率能力（可能指的是主摄像头传感器），以及标准型号不具备的、潜在的其他屏幕或功能增强，包括评论员所描述的 Ultra 更“高”的屏幕。 尽管与 Ultra 相比功能有所缩减，Amell 仍对 Z Fold 8 独特的形态表现出热情。他总结道，许多用户可能会对这种新的设计方向“相当兴奋”，这表明其独特的屏幕宽高比和更易接受的价格在折叠屏市场中创造了一个引人注目的替代品。Z Fold 8 似乎旨在吸引那些优先考虑新颖、小工具般的外形和多功能内屏体验的用户，即使这意味着要放弃 Ultra 一些顶级的摄像头技术。

The Verge's David Amell introduces the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8, highlighting its significantly altered and unique aspect ratio as its most striking feature. Departing from previous foldable designs, the Z Fold 8 aims to redefine the user experience with its new dimensions. The outer screen of the Z Fold 8 adopts a 10 by 16 aspect ratio. This makes the phone appear noticeably shorter and wider, giving it a more "squared off" profile compared to conventional smartphones. Amell describes its feel as reminiscent of a personal digital assistant (PDA) or a specialized "gadget-type device," suggesting a departure from the typical elongated phone form factor. This design choice implies a focus on a different kind of handheld interaction, perhaps favoring one-handed use or a broader display for quick tasks when closed. Upon unfolding, the device reveals an inner screen with a 4 by 3 aspect ratio, which can also be viewed as 3 by 4 when rotated. Amell emphasizes the versatility of this interior display. The 4 by 3 orientation is presented as superior for watching video content, offering a more expansive viewing area than traditional narrower screens. Conversely, when held in the 3 by 4 orientation, it transforms into an ideal format for e-reading, mimicking the dimensions of a book or a dedicated e-reader. This particular aspect ratio is noted as being increasingly popular, with Amell mentioning reports that Apple is also developing a device with similar proportions, positioning Samsung as having "beat them to the punch" with the Z Fold 8. While acknowledging that the 4 by 3 ratio isn't the standard 16 by 9 or 2 by 1, meaning users will still encounter some black bars during certain media consumption, Amell considers it a definite improvement over the nearly square internal displays found in many traditional foldable phones. The new aspect ratio thus strikes a balance, offering a better media and reading experience within the foldable paradigm. Amell then draws a direct comparison between the Z Fold 8 and its higher-end sibling, the Z Fold 8 Ultra, particularly in the camera department. The standard Z Fold 8 is equipped with a dual-camera setup, featuring a 50-megapixel main sensor and a 50-megapixel ultra-wide sensor. In contrast, the Z Fold 8 Ultra boasts a more comprehensive triple-camera system, including a massive 200-megapixel main camera, a 50-megapixel ultra-wide, and a 10-megapixel telephoto lens. This significant difference means the Z Fold 8 won't offer the same advanced photographic capabilities as the Ultra model. However, when it comes to battery life and charging, the two models are much more closely matched. The Z Fold 8 houses a 4,800 mAh battery, only slightly smaller than the 5,000 mAh unit found in the Z Fold 8 Ultra. Both devices support rapid charging, with 45-watt wired charging and 20-watt wireless charging capabilities. This parity in power features ensures that even the standard Z Fold 8 provides robust endurance and quick top-ups. Naturally, the difference in specifications translates into a price differential. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 is priced at $1,900, making it $200 less expensive than the Z Fold 8 Ultra, which costs $2,100. This $200 premium for the Ultra model buys users the more advanced camera array, higher resolution capabilities (likely referring to the main camera sensor), and potentially other screen or feature enhancements not present in the standard model, including what the reviewer describes as a "taller screen" for the Ultra. Despite the reduced feature set compared to the Ultra, Amell expresses enthusiasm for the Z Fold 8's unique form factor. He concludes that many users will likely be "pretty excited" about this new design direction, suggesting that its distinctive aspect ratio and more accessible price point create a compelling alternative within the foldable market. The Z Fold 8 appears positioned to attract those who prioritize a fresh, gadget-like form factor and a versatile internal display experience, even if it means foregoing some of the Ultra's top-tier camera technology.