Reliability is Bottleneck on AI - OpenAI Founder

If I were to take the premise of your question, why were things disappointing in terms of the real world impact? My answer would be reliability.

如果我采取你问题的前提，为什么实际世界的影响令人失望？我的回答将是可靠性。

If somehow it ends up being the case that you really want them to be reliable and then it would not have been reliable or if reliability did not be harder, then we expect.

如果最终你真的想让它们可靠，而它们并没有可靠性，或者可靠性没有变得更难，那么我们会感到失望。

I really don't think that will be the case, but if I had to pick one, if I had to pick one and you tell me like, hey, why didn't things work out, it would be reliability that you still have to look over the answer is in double check everything and that's just really puts a damper on the economic value that can be used by those systems.

我真的不认为会变成这种情况，但如果我必须选一个，如果我必须选一个，而你告诉我：“嘿，为什么事情没能成功呢？”那会是可靠性，你仍然得仔细检查，答案就在于检查一切，这真的对这些系统可以使用的经济价值带来了抑制。

They'll be technologically mature. It's just a question of whether it'll be reliable or not. In some sense, not reliable means not technologically mature. You see what I mean.

他们会变得技术成熟。问题只在于它是否可靠。在某种程度上，不可靠意味着不够成熟。你明白我说的吧。