Hello my friends, today is January 31st and this is March of the week late. So this past week was a historic week. Not only did we get a new Fed share nominee, we also had a historic implosion in the precious metals, especially silver, down 30% in one day. So I think these two are linked, but just a little bit. So today let's talk about two things. First off, let's talk about who a future chair wash is. And secondly, let's talk about the precious metals starting with Kevin Wash.
So over the past few months, it's been a roller coaster when it comes to the Fed share race. Now for most parts, Kevin Passen was in the lead and he was also a who I thought would be that chair. Now Kevin Passen was someone who had been with the president for a decade. He was the president's economist, chair of economic advisors during the president's first term. And right now he is a president of Nick, another high level policy making role. He's been a president's loyal economist for a long time. So it's the reason that he would be other president's future nominee.
With some phone, the president could trust, they tried to cut race as much as possible. But a couple of weeks ago, the president went out of his way at a prince conference to make the comment that it's probably not going to be a asset. Now in retrospect, it seems like the kind of the curve up with the criminal allegations against the Fed may have made some Republican senators less willing to confirm nominees that are perceived to be too loyal to the president. So that might have hurt him.
So after Kevin Hassek was out of the picture, the race came down to the reader, CIO at Black Rock. And then, Kevin Warsh, who was formerly a governor at the Fed during the great financial crises and almost nominated by the president to be fed chair during his first term. Now I've written about both of these guys. And to me, it was kind of a neck to neck race. I wasn't really sure what would happen.
No, Rick Reader, I thought was someone who was actually very smart, very thoughtful. I think a good understanding of how the financial system worked today. Against them was that he previously had donated to Democrats and doesn't have really much of a relationship with the president and also even donated to the public and the people in the past who else and just not friends with the president. So it was, I think it was going to be difficult for the president to trust such an important job to this person who had such, you know, kind of no clear ties with him.
Though maybe he's from a policy standpoint, maybe on the same page. Now Kevin Warsh has always been someone who I thought was bizarre that the president would like him. And I think many people feel this way as well. The reason being that Kevin Warsh has been a hawk, his entire career. He has been governor in the past and we can look from his previous statements declassified meeting transcripts and also he's been in public life just the podcast and lectures and op-eds and so forth for a long time.
And it's really, really clear who he is. He is a ginormous, ginormous hawk always, always talking about the feds of balance he'd too big and, you know, thinking that this would cause inflation and whatnot. Now Anna Wong from Blueberry Con economics had a really good chart of overlaying the unemployment rate, inflation rate and some of comments from Kevin Warsh during the great financial crises. Now, heading into the GFC, Kevin Warsh was like financial system totally, totally okay guys.
But by the way, I'm worried about inflation. And you know, in the retrospect, obviously the financial system was not totally okay. But you know, everyone made that mistake, right? Ben Bernanke made that mistake and I think Ben Bernanke did a really good job as the chair, a totally great crisis fighter. So after the great financial crisis, unemployment rate, close at 10%, we were in the beginning of the great recession.
Kevin Warsh, smart guy, obviously he updated his priorities, right? He learned, right? So well, actually no. No, even with the unemployment rate at multi-decade highs, Kevin Warsh was like, you know, I'm kind of concerned about inflation. So that was a call that was wrong, right? It seemed like his primary driver of his constant concern over inflation of the past decade was that the feds balance sheet. And that was also a totally reasonable stance, right?
There were some people who had a monstrous view of the world saying that, hey, fed expanding balance sheet, putting a lot of money, increasing money supply, we're going to have a lot of inflation, right? And at that time, a gold crisis was surging. There was literally been concern from running smart people. Okay. So after a decade of this, now we can see that that's actually not how the world works. Did Kevin update his mental model? No, no, he's still saying the exact same thing.
So he's someone who's consistently hawkish and someone who also is not able to update mental models. So that's kind of concerning, but for whatever reason, you know, President Likeson, I think over the past few months, he's also moderated stance. He's been talking about, you know, we had a productivity miracle. So we're going to be able to cut race and so forth, right? Saying the right things. But I think it's also very important to note that his father-in-law is Mr. Louter of Estee Lauder fame billionaire, and also someone who has been a big political donor to the president, to the Republican Party for a long time, and also washed his extremely, extremely well connected.
He knows a lot of influential people. And these influential people over the past few months, all came to bat for him. So there's a very, very wide campaign behind the scenes where he had all these important people that you would know, you would recognize, come and just put in a good word for Kevin Wash and in contrast, you know, Kevin Haset did not have the same network also, you know, perceived to be difficult to confirm, read reader, didn't seem to campaign as hard. So Kevin Wash definitely ran a very good campaign about this.
And upon his nomination, you can see on Twitter, you had all these people congratulate him. So you got the Elmohamnelerian, you got Jason Perman, you got even Mark Karney, Prime Minister of Canada, all of these people pouring out and congratulating Kevin Wash, great guy. These are all people in his network. He is super well connected and these all these people pulled for him and that seemed to have pushed him across the finish line.
So what does a chairwashed bad mean? So first and foremost, he is finally going to be able to complete his dream of shrinking the fence balance sheet. Now, there's a lot of people saying that this will never happen. This is ridiculous. Trump loves to stop Marking and so forth. So I think those people are going to be wrong. The reason I think they're wrong is that a smaller fed balance sheet is actually a consensus position in the Trump administration. Secretary Becant believes in this. Governor Bowman believes in this. Governor Myron believes in this.
This is something they want to do and this is something they can do. This is, you know, I don't think this is not interest for policy. It's not a fed independence issue. So I think we have enough to do this. Question is why they want to. I don't know. Now the process doing this. It requires a lot of groundwork because it's going to be a fundamental transformation in how policy is implemented. So you're going to have to have a lot of baking deregulation, which they're on trial to doing.
And you're going to have public and volatility in the markets. And let's do it very, very slowly. Now, this is, in my view, probably going to be risk negative, depending on how smooth, limit how the baking regulations go for. So, you know, the thing is Kevin Wash openly tells you that he thinks that the strength of the balance sheet is going to be a tightening impact. And that's part of reason why you think so you can cut rates. So it's all out in the open. This is really what they want to do.
And probably talk more about the, or read about this, this is fake about how I think this could happen and what the implications were. But overall, I think this is risk negative. Now the market took a look at this nomination. Surprised a bit. I guess this guy is like the harsh person of all the president's candidates. And so you had immediate reaction where you had the curve steepen a bit. So more rate cuts, but you know, the longer end sells off a bit, probably because the balance sheet thing.
And also you have the dollar knee drug strengthening. And that leads us to our second topic, the total implosion in the precious metals market. So listen, we've been talking about the precious metals silver in particular for the past few weeks. Now silver, as I noted over and over again, is the original meme point. Retail speculators love silver, right? And silver over the past few decades, you can see that periodically it just surges to the moon and then it implodes happen in the 1980s, happened in the 2010s.
And I know this because I was in silver at that time, you know, making a lot of money. And then I remember distinctly one Sunday evening, a global X open and then just all him crashing down. And there was a attempt to recapture the the the highest 50 at that time. And then it just lost that and then just totally imploded. It was a painful experience. So looking at this extreme stream surge in silver.
And again, I instinctively knew that this is going to happen again. This is just how markets work. It's just a new generation understanding and learning about speculation. So earlier in the week, I posted this that guys I'm going to go and sell some physical silver. I was already all on my paper silver and looking at prices surge. I think at that day was like one ten and fifteen. I was like, this is totally ridiculous. And then I was looking at the silver bars that I had. Why am I holding this? You know, if you really think about it, I mean, what am I using this stock? What am I using this stock for? Honestly, it's on the ground in front of some wires so that my robot vacuum will not be chomping on the wires. Sometimes I use silver bars to hammer something. I've watched some convincing footage that says it's very effective against werewolves, but other than that, you know, this stuff is this stuff. It's just it's just the huge rock, right?
It's so so what, what am I doing with this? In some weird bizarre scenario, where we actually have a man next world. This is totally not useful, but would be useful with something like a technology, for example, right? If we live in a mad max world, you're not going to have any more computers or cell phones. And this stuff, this stuff is really, really difficult to make. It takes hundreds of vendors, a lot of engineers. It's basically the tenacle of our technological civilization. And even the mad max world, you won't be able to make these texts up anymore. So you would have these useful things, not this rock. Even if you were, you know, thinking about having the sort of value, silver is actually that good for that because it's too heavy. And if you, you know, a hundred ounce bar, it's like 10 grand, but it's heavy. You can't really move it around. You would gold, for example, would be much, much better for that.
So I went and took my silver bar to the local dealer and he offered me, you know, I actually notably below spot. Nice like 15, 20 below spot, but I took it anyway. And then I posted and I came back and I saw how viral my posts had gone. I saw the comments and I'm like, holy shit, I'm not bearish enough. All these low information investors just kind of clamoring yet. And so the next day I went to try to sell another bar. And to my surprise, the dealer actually told me that he's not buying. He was not buying too many people selling his, the, the foundry that he sells to also can pay him for like two months, his vault is full. So he's not. So I have to actually go to a couple other dealers to try to find people to to to upload my bars.
And I also note that when I was lining in line, not in line to try to sell silver, there's a long line in people selling basically all boomers with their, you know, who've been stacking for some time. It seems in the window to buy silver only one person, a zoomer. So I was like, yeah, this is just part of learning, I guess. So in the internet, I noticed that people are saying, guys, it's not the top. It's not the top. You know why? It's because at the top, everyone is clamoring to buy. Everyone's trying to sell. So obviously it's not the top. And I thought about that for a little bit. But then guys, if I want a sell silver and I can't even sell, that can't be that can't be risk positive, right?
And also, it's about a dis misinformation like that. For example, there's some people saying that I'm actually being able to, my dealer is buying silver above spot. That's just so stupid, guys. That's totally not what how a dealer works. A dealer works at the same thing as a dealer in the treasury market. For example, let's say that spot is 100. He's going to buy a low spot and sell above spot. He makes that spread. That's how he makes his money. Buying low, selling high, you know, bit ask a bit offer and so forth, right? That's how dealers work. So, to me, this is just totally, totally insane.
Now I remember all these people coming out and we don't you get it. Fiat is going to zero. Don't you get it? You know, Chinese are buying. Don't you get it? Right? The stuff, the banks are short. We're going to go mop and so forth. Now, what these guys don't get though is that back in the 2010s, people said the exact same thing. I'm not even joking. They said the exact same thing. That's everyone was buying into 50. They said it on the way to 50 and they said it on the way down to 15. What's even more surprising is that when I look back to the 1980s looking into when the Hunts and Brothers are trying to squeeze silver. Same thing actually. Inflation is high. Deficit is our large.
Guys, this is basically your debatement rate and they said that all the way up to 50 and all the way down to $7. So, the stuff guys just happens over and over again. All this is speculation, momentum, leverage, so forth, highly, highly unstable. And so, when you have a very, very unstable thing, you just have a little push to overwhelm to tip over the apple cart. And that's what Kevin Worsh did. He just comes in, jala strength is not hugely, but you know, markedly, but that seems to unravel everything. You got, when volatility picks up, some pretty sells, he's over levered. Some people off the sell, and then you have these people who are, you know, managed according to volatility, volatility spikes. They have to sell. You got CTAs looking at momentum. They have to sell everyone's sells. And then it becomes really, really disorderly, which is exactly what happened down 30% a day. That is one for the history books.
It's really, really shocking to me how badly this has played out, but also how much levers it was in their system. Now, as an aside, though, I would also note that having silver, but some people were saying like hundreds of dollars, that's never going to happen. It's not going to happen because silver is different from, you know, this other crap people have speculated, right? Silver is actually an industrial metal. Stuff like a meme coins, dog coins, stuff like that. You can go push that as high as you want. Nobody cares. But if you, but silver is something that has to do with industrial policy, national security, stuff like that. So the government is not going to let the speculators squeeze it too, too really high because it actually packs a lot of important interest groups.
And so in the 1980s, you have all these people who basically gotten together to wrickly games. So that silver imploded huge market hikes. Of course, also only letting people sell, not buy and so forth. So I mean, if you want to push something higher in gold, in my view, is something that could go higher. These industrial models, you're fighting politically car meat. But gold, of course, also huge, huge depth, 10% down. Now, I'm not as negative about gold. I think gold actually, I think we could still have higher highs this year. It seems like there's a lot of things going on. Higher dynamics, and not as lover, and also much stronger demand base.
You actually have, for example, central banks or other people who are a little bit more conservative in their views buying gold. Now, you will not have central banks by silver. That's just not what they buy. So I think that my best guess for silver is that we kind of try to push up. Maybe I don't try to touch 100 or something like that. We sell, and then it'd be the end. Until again, looking at the silver graph. A few decades. Gold though, I'm much more positive. I'm not as worried about that.
So one thing to note is that that's really, really in gold's favor is that we do have real geopolitical risk heating up right now. So a carrier has entered the Middle East last week. And it does seem like they're going to try to do something over there. And so that's going to be, now this is probably not going to be Venezuela. Again, President has been very calculated and has used military force. By the way, this is not at all MAGA. But he, you know, these calculations are difficult to make. You have huge amounts of uncertainty in geopolitics. A lot of things that are difficult to predict, and we don't know that we don't know.