Hello my friends, today is February 7th and this is markets weekly. So this past week was a volatile weekend markets. The week before we had volatility in the precious metals this week it was in the major indexes. Looking at the S&P 500, we briefly broke below the 100 day moving average. However, we did have a monster rally on Friday and that took us right back above the 50 day moving average, which many market participants perceived to be indicative of an ongoing uptrend. However, zooming out when I look at this it seems really obvious that we've gone nowhere for months and continue to lose momentum so it does not look good to me.
So today let's talk about three things. First off, we have to talk about the labor market where it seems like we're getting worse labor market data and that's suggestive of more cuts than what's currently priced into the market. Secondly, let's talk a little bit about the carnage in the stock market. It seems to be largely driven by tech in part due to Amazon earnings in part due to a new AI model from Anthropic that is challenging the business models of software as a service companies. And lastly, we have to talk a little bit about crypto. We had tremendous volatility in Bitcoin down to 60,000, but of course rebounded by $10,000 on Friday. It seems like we may be heading into a crypto winter.
All right, starting with the labor market. So last week we had the challenger report something that was pretty surprising. So challenger is a private consulting company that goes and pulls companies about their intentions to hire or fire. Now according to them, businesses have significantly wrapped up their intention to layoff workers. In fact, the total amount of announced layoffs could be as high as it's been in many years. Now that seems to be coordinated by official data that was announced a few days later. The Joltz report that shows that job openings surprisingly decreased. Now job openings for job openings per worker looking for a job has now declined to levels that are below pre-pandemic. So it's very clear that the labor market continues to soften.
Now recall, at the last thin meeting, Governor Waller dissented and wanted a 25 basis point cut. The rationale he gave was that he was hearing from his contacts that everyone is thinking about laying off workers. And so they were a significant downside risk to the labor market. Now we all thought it was because he wanted to be fed share and maybe that plays a role. But it seemed like his information was accurate. So normally we would have gotten the non-formist payroll report on Friday. But because of a government shutdown, that's been postponed until Wednesday. So at that time we'll get the gold standard labor market report. But the direction seems very clear. The labor market is softening. And if that's the case, that also suggests downside risk to inflation.
The US is largely as services driven in economy. If you look at the inflation indexes, it's also largely services driven as well. If you have a weak labor market, then wage growth will decelerate. And that suggests downward pressure on service inflation, which of course implies downward pressure on the broader inflation indexes. Together, we could labor market, we could inflation. I suggest that we'll probably get more Fed cuts than the two cuts priced into the market. That will make a share worse drop a lot easier.
Okay, the second thing we have to talk about, of course, is the volatility and the equity markets. And this was largely centered in tech. So over the past few weeks, we got the MagSeptic earnings. And they've been announcing a lot of capital expenditures into AI. This has been an ongoing thing. If you look at this chart from the Wall Street Journal, you can see that collectively, the MagSeptic companies are investing hundreds of billions in the AI buildup, right? Buying data centers, GPU chips, power plants and so forth. So it's been something that the market is aware of. And in the past, as rewarded, seeing that the companies are investing in AI, I guess made investors think that they are going to benefit from the AI revolution.
As an aside, President MacKona France also announced that he's going to doing some investments into AI. He announced a 30 million investment in AI researchers. That is not billion, okay. In any case, then the market has usually rewarded the maximum companies for investing in AI. But this week, though, there seems to be a little bit of a change in tune. Now, when Amazon announced that they would invest 200 billion in AI this year, the market punished them. So their stock was down 10% after earnings. Now, sometimes it seems to have rewarded meta, for example. But now it seems to be not clearly good for their stock price. So that could potentially market change in tune in how the market is receiving this. Because obviously, when the company is spending so much money on AI, it's less cash available to return to shareholders in the form of buybacks.
And of course, it is a huge bet. AI is obviously really quote technology, but it may not be very profitable. It is obviously a competitive, competitive industry. I also note that at the announcement of Amazon's huge capis expenditures, I would have expected companies like Nvidia and other chipmakers to benefit. But I didn't see that, so that was interesting. Now, the other thing in the tech world, of course, was the announcement of Anthropic AI. It's a new cloud version, which apparently can do a lot of vibe coding really well that allows people who are not trained programmers to be able to vibe code things really easily.
Basically, customize software that could potentially replace software that their companies currently use. Let's say things like document review, back office stuff, payroll accounting, maybe stuff like that. So companies that currently specialize in things like that like Salesforce or Adobe, they saw their stock price decline pretty notably the past week. The thinking is, of course, if a company can use an AI bot to create customized vibe-coded software to suit their needs and protect their own data at a very, very low price, why would they be using these software as a services of these SaaS companies?
And so that kind of makes sense, but then we also have to keep in mind that a lot of these companies have long-standing relations with their services providers. And of course, you have a lot of employees who probably don't want to change the way they currently do things. So there is some sticking as there. But in any case, the market was a little bit panic. Now, this also bled into the credit markets as well. So over the past few years, a lot of the private credit companies have been lending to software companies in a big way. Erie's capital corporation, which manages the largest business BDC, publicly traded BDC, which is a publicly traded private credit fund, has almost a quarter of their assets in loans to software companies.
Now, again, software companies are all different. People do different things. But the market is looking at this in their worry that AI could cannibalize other software companies and that could present downside risks to not just equities, but to the loans that people made to these companies. So if you look at the stocks of the managers of these private credit funds, they all took a dive as well. So you seem to have some contagion where AI is significantly disrupting adjacent industries in software. Now, in the long run, this could all be very good. We could have more efficiencies, lower costs and so forth.
But in a short run, this is definitely disrupting existing business models as creative destruction always does. So again, this is probably a panic. You could have a lot of people having leveraged exposure to all this stuff, just kind of degrocing and so forth, but it is a trend to watch for. All right, the last thing that I want to talk about, of course, is crypto. Now, this last week, we saw tremendous volatility in Bitcoin. Now we saw Bitcoin drop 10 grand to 60,000 on Thursday, possibly a bad earnings report, but then it did rebound on Friday to above 70,000.
And when you take a step back and you look at it, it looks like Bitcoin has basically given up all the gains that it had from the Trump, from the Trump boost. Now, President Trump was famously going to be a crypto president. He even spoke at the Bitcoin conference and was greeted with huge, huge cheers. Now upon his ascension to the White House, he did carry out a lot of pro crypto promises. He himself, of course, his family is dabbling in many crypto related ventures. The president himself launched a Trump coin.
He did shepherd and legislation, the genius act that created a regulatory framework for dollar-state of the coins and even suggested the creation of a strategic Bitcoin reserve. So from the government side, the president has really done a lot to be pro crypto, definitely a sharp contrast to President Biden. Now, sounding all of this, we saw crypto surge to 125,000. It seems to fall an old way back. And so I think that is impacting a lot of market sentiment. And it's not just Bitcoin, Bitcoin, of course, is the gold standard in the crypto world. But if you look at other coins, they're also not doing very well.
It seems to me that there is a very much crisis of confidence in the crypto world. So everyone buys and sells assets for different reasons. So it's always careful. You don't want to draw strong conclusions. But one of the biggest arguments, some proponents for Bitcoin and other crypto is that it's basically a hedge against fiat, there's a basement trade and so forth. And what we've seen over the past few months is that it doesn't seem to have been benefiting from the debasement trade.
Now, over the past few months, you've seen gold surge. You've seen silver surge. Now, these are traditional. But people think of a traditional debasement trade. Even, let's say, basementals have surge, say copper, stuff like that, aluminum. And over the past year, you've also seen the dollars that are weak and you have a sell America trade that emerges sometimes. But through all that, Bitcoin just continues to sell off. And so it's not doing what many people thought it would do.
And so there is very much a crisis as to, well, what drives it? Why isn't going up? Why isn't it trailing gold so much? And of course, you will have people who trade it on technicals. And if you look at Bitcoin, it's been hanging out below the 200-day moving average for some time, which, and very clearly not in an uptrend. So there does seem to be a lot of concern there.
Now, I would also note that the people who invest in Bitcoin, honestly, usually are tech savvy, and so they could be invested in other tech stocks as well. And so you could have, this could be in part, be a deleveraging thing where people who are invested in, say, tech or maybe high-momentum stuff like silver also have to deleverage because of their exposure to these clear losing assets and that bleeds into crypto.
But overall, though, it does seem like things are not looking good. But of course, zooming out, you know that many times, over the many years, that Bitcoin has gone through periodic winters where prices have been very low for extended periods of time where everyone has run the math. But you do also, again, see it for whatever reason, search to new highs.
So it's always difficult to say this is obviously a very sentiment and momentum driven asset. But at the moment, though, I think many people who bought this on the idea that it would be a hedge against Fiat are having a crisis of confidence. All right, so that's what we prepared for today. Thanks so much for tuning in. And I'll talk to you guys next.